Steel Antitrust Litigation
Settlement Website

Frequently Asked Questions

Helpful Hint: Using the general subject of your question may provide the best search results. For example, enter the word "hearing" in the search box to find information about the Settlement's Fairness Hearing.

1. Why did I receive a Proof of Claim in this matter?

If you bought Steel Products directly from one or more of the Defendants for delivery in the United States between April 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007, you could be a Settlement Class Member. Notices were previously mailed to you to inform you of your rights in the Settlements. The Proof of Claim indicates the total purchases each defendant has reported receiving from you.

(collapse all)

2. What is the lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges that the Defendants conspired, in violation of the U.S. antitrust laws, to restrict their output and therefore raise or fix the prices for Steel Products sold for delivery in the United States between April 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007.

The complaints allege that the Defendants violated the U.S. antitrust laws by conspiring to slow down their furnace production, thus restricting their output of raw steel and causing artificially higher prices for Steel Products.

The Defendants deny the allegations, and there has not yet been a determination of the merits of the case.

(collapse all)

3. Who are the Defendants?

The lawsuit was filed against ArcelorMittal S.A. and ArcelorMittal USA, LLC (together “ArcelorMittal”), Nucor Corporation (“Nucor”) , United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel”) , Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation (“Gerdau”), AK Steel Holding Corporation (“AK Steel”), Steel Dynamics, Inc. (“Steel Dynamics”), SSAB Swedish Steel Corporation (“SSAB”) and Commercial Metals Company (“CMC”).

Defendants CMC, AK Steel, and Gerdau agreed to settle the claims against them in this lawsuit and will pay $15.9 million into a Settlement Fund. Subsequently, a settlement was reached with Defendant ArcelorMittal, ArcelorMittal has agreed to pay $90 million into the Settlement Fund. Most recently, Defendant U.S. Steel has agreed to pay $58 million into the Settlement Fund. Collectively, these defendants are referred to as the Settling Defendants.

The Settling Defendants deny the allegations against them, deny that they engaged in a conspiracy or did anything wrong, and have asserted a number of defenses, but they have nevertheless agreed to settle to avoid the cost of further litigation and trial.

(collapse all)

4. Who are the Settling Defendants?

Defendants CMC, AK Steel, and Gerdau agreed to settle the claims against them in this lawsuit and have paid $15.9 million into a Settlement Fund. Subsequently, a settlement was reached with Defendant ArcelorMittal, which has paid $90 million into the Settlement Fund. Finally, Defendant U.S. Steel settled and has paid $58 million into the Settlement Fund. Collectively, these defendants are referred to as the Settling Defendants.

(collapse all)

5. What about the Non-Settling Defendants?

Nucor, Steel Dynamics and SSAB are referred to as the Non-Settling Defendants.

The Plaintiffs' claims against the Non-Settling Defendants will continue to be prepared for trial or other judicial resolution.

(collapse all)

6. Who is included in the Settlements?

All persons who purchased Steel Products directly from any of the Defendants or their subsidiaries or controlled affiliates at any time between April 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007 for delivery in the United States.

(collapse all)

7. Who is excluded from the Settlements?

Excluded from the Settlement Class are the Defendants, their present and former parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, joint ventures, co-conspirators and government entities and any parties that previously requested exclusion from one or more of the Settlements.

(collapse all)

8. What are Steel Products?

Steel Products are defined as products derived from raw carbon steel, including all carbon steel slabs, plates, sheet and coil products, galvanized and other coated sheet products; billets, blooms, rebar, merchant bar, beams and other structural shapes; and all other steel products derived from raw carbon steel, except for certain products that have been excluded.

Steel Products specifically exclude the following product categories: stainless steel; grain-oriented electrical steel; tin mill products; clad plate (i.e., nickel, stainless or copper clad plate); steel pipe and other tubular products; "special bar quality" products; wire rod and other wire products; grinding balls; fabricated rebar products; fabricated steel joist, decking, fence posts and other fabricated building products; welded steel blanks; and steel products purchased under toll processing agreements.

(collapse all)

9. What purchase transactions are included?

All purchases of Steel Products for which pricing was negotiated during the class period, April 1, 2005 through December 31, 2007, and delivery was received during the class period.

Also included are purchases of Steel Products for which a sales contract was negotiated prior to April 1st, 2005 but delivery was received between April 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007 and the actual transaction price under the contract was adjusted or indexed based on market pricing that prevailed during the class period.

(collapse all)

10. What does it mean to purchase "directly" from the Defendants?

A direct purchase is a purchase made directly from one of the eight Defendants or a subsidiary or controlled affiliate of a Defendant. A purchase from an intermediary, such as a distributor or service center, is not a direct purchase.

(collapse all)

11. What do the Settlements provide?

The Settling Defendants have paid a total of $163.9 million for the benefit of the Settlement Class. ArcelorMittal has paid $90,000,000; U.S. Steel has paid $58,000,000; Gerdau has paid $6,100,000; AK Steel has paid $5,800,000; and CMC has paid $3,999,999.

Also as part of the Settlements, the Settling Defendants will cooperate with Plaintiffs as they continue to prosecute this lawsuit against the Non-Settling Defendants.

(collapse all)

12. How do I submit a claim if I agree with the purchase data?

If you would like to submit a claim and you agree with the purchase data printed on your Proof of Claim, sign and complete Part 4, Submission to Jurisdiction of the Court and Verification; and submit Proof of Claim form postmarked no later than February 3, 2015 to:

Steel Antitrust Litigation
c/o GCG
P.O. Box 10121
Dublin, Ohio 43017-3121
1-844-322-8242

(collapse all)

13. How do I submit a claim form if I disagree with the purchase data?

If you disagree with the purchase data printed on your Proof of Claim Form, you must complete Sections 3 and 4 of the Proof of Claim form and submit it with documentation in support of the revised amounts, postmarked no later than February 3, 2015 to:

Steel Antitrust Litigation
c/o GCG
P.O. Box 10121
Dublin, Ohio 43017-3121
1-844-322-8242

(collapse all)

14. How can I get a Proof of Claim form?

You can request a Proof of Claim Form be mailed to you by contacting GCG.

(collapse all)

15. What is the deadline for submitting my Proof of Claim?

If mailed, Proof of Claims must be postmarked no later than February 3, 2015. If sent in any other way, Proof of Claims must be received no later than February 3, 2015.

(collapse all)

16. What if I received more than one Proof of Claim form?

If you received multiple identical Proof of Claim forms (for example, at multiple addresses), you should complete and return only one of them. If you received multiple different Proof of Claim Forms, you should complete, sign and return all of them. The easiest way to determine whether Proof of Claim forms are identical or different is to compare the Reference Number on Page 1 of the form.

(collapse all)

17. When will I receive a payment?

We expect to be able to distribute the settlement funds by the end of the summer.

(collapse all)

18. How much will my payment be?

As described in the Plan of Allocation, each Class Member’s claim is based on the amounts each Class Member paid for qualifying Steel Products during the period April 1, 2005 – December 31, 2007. The net Settlement Funds will be distributed to Class Members on a pro rata basis, with Class Members’ purchases of Steel Products from all of the Defendants serving as the basis for the calculation. More information on the Plan of Allocation can be found here.

(collapse all)

19. Do I have a lawyer in this case?

The Court has appointed the following as Co-Lead Counsel for the Settlement Class:

FINE, KAPLAN AND BLACK, R.P.C.
One South Broad Street, 23rd Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19107

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C.
Sumner Square
1615 M Street, NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036

(collapse all)

20. How will the Lawyers be paid?

In conjunction with approval of the settlements, the Court awarded attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses to Co-Lead Counsel out of the Settlement Fund. You do not owe them anything further.

(collapse all)

21. Should I hire a Lawyer?

You do not need to hire your own lawyer, but you may do so if you wish. If you hire your own lawyer, you will have to pay for that lawyer at your own expense.

(collapse all)

22. How do I get more information?

You can get complete copies of the Settlement Agreements, Plan of Allocation, and other important documents located on the Case Documents page of this site.

Complete copies of public pleadings, Court rulings and other filings are available for review and copying at the Clerk's office. The address is United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL, 60604.

(collapse all)